#Cakewalk home studio 2002 manual 32 bit
#Cakewalk home studio 2002 manual manual
#Cakewalk home studio 2002 manual pro
#Cakewalk home studio 2002 manual free

After I managed to wade through that I found the program a breeze to use. This had mostly to do with getting the VST inputs and outs routed and getting a default setting that was suitable for me. I admit there was 2 days at the beginning where I was beginning to get frustrated. I think it behaves very much like a tape recorder and mixing console.

#Cakewalk home studio 2002 manual 32 bit

I'm using Cubase VST 5.1 which is the same program as VST 32 5.1 without 32 bit in out.I have found this program very easy to use. they really shouldn't have called it cubase at all. If I wanted to waste hours then I would use Cubase. I tried a demo of CuBase and NEVER could figure out where things were or what they did. I don't know what everyone is whining about when they say Cubase is a hard program to learn. SteveīTW, I tried a demo of CuBase and NEVER could figure out where things were or what they did. Just another viewpoint - I'm out in the boonies and do mostly my own projects which I want to sound as good as possible, so I doubt if I'll EVER join the 'Alsihad' snobs.

#Cakewalk home studio 2002 manual pro

But I've talked to a couple of people who claim they have pro tools to get them in, but do most of the real work with Samplitude because it sounds better. If you're doing other people's projects where you have clients in regularly, the name recognition of ProTools is important.

If you don't need MIDI, or just need to sync (either direction) to MIDI or SMPTE, I would highly recommend Samplitude. Some things were too simple, and I felt like a dork when I called tech support and got the answers. Intuitively, Samp is pretty easy to learn the basics, and so far everything I wished it could do was just a menu or two deeper than I'd already been. Can't wait to hear it with the new gear (re-doing entire studio this year) I think they are one of the best-kept secrets in digital audio. Soundwise, even at only 20 bit in, 32 float til burn time, Samplitude has never made me wish for better sound. I'm going to be building a new DAW this winter, most likely two separate P4 machines with one dedicated to virtual instruments and MIDI, the other to audio recording, at which time Sonar will be the main program on the synth machine, samplitude the ONLY program on the audio machine. I have Sonar, but have yet to load it since the virtual synths take more horsepower than my old DAW has available. The reason I use both Cake and Samplitude is that Cake still hadn't figured out what digital audio was by version 9. Cake's MIDI implementation is pretty straight-forward, the editing is easy. I use Cake 9 synced with Samplitude Producer, and I agree with Fats on the 'kludge' factor, especially the digital audio portion of the program. I have heard a lot about Cubase in BBS'S all over the net and I may consider it on my next serious original project. Thanks for parting with some of your experiences, Fats. Lots of plugins, wide file compatibility and very stable….

I ended up going with Cubase and I couldn't be happier. I did a D/L off the Internet and then ordered a disk from Didgidesign.

#Cakewalk home studio 2002 manual free

Pro Tools Free is real weird to get running correctly. Cool Edit doesn't allow use of a lot of the Plug ins out and I didn't care much for the ones that are available through Direct X. I looked at Cool Edit Pro (it came bundled free with my soundcard) and I decided I didn't care much for it either. I have always shied away form Cakewalk since that experience. All in all we had a hard time getting through the project.

#Cakewalk home studio 2002 manual manual

I didn't think the manual was of very much help. A client brought a project in on his own computer using Cakewalk and I personally found it to be kludgy. I have had experience with Cakewalk at my studio.